Has anyone seen this article?
I occasionally talk about my political opinions, but I try not to make this a political blog as the childfree subject matter is sensitive enough without having to pour 5 gallons of kerosene onto the fire. However, the upcoming US election is obviously a hot topic at home as well as other places. I hadn’t posted about the Republican VP nominee, Sarah Palin, until now. Those of you who read my blog regularly probably can figure out what my opinion is of her (pssst…it’s less than favorable). I was trying to put off posting about it until just the right thing inspired me too, and the above article was the final straw that broke the proverbial camel’s back.
Seriously, a fertility symbol? Of course, I can’t say that I’m at all surprised as she keeps popping out the kids and her first grandchild will be less than a year younger than her youngest child. Don’t think about that one too long folks…it’ll make your head hurt. I highly encourage you to go read the whole thing, but I’ll point out some of the highlights.
Granted, much of this all plays out at a subconscious, even primal (and, therefore, difficult to measure) level, but Palin’s successful mothering of five children, one of whom is now pregnant herself, surely conveys to voters a deeply powerful message of prosperity, health, growth and success.
Did anyone else just throw up in their mouth? You just can’t make this shit up. Seriously? There’s just too much going on in this one, long sentence. “Conveys to voters a deeply powerful message of prosperity, health, growth and success.” Just because you can have kids, doesn’t mean that you’ll have all four of those things. In fact, I tend to think you’ll have quite the opposite in most cases. It just goes with the old “Once you’re a mother your life is complete and that’s the only way your life will be complete” crap that is shoved down our throats day in and day out. And SECOND, I just can’t pass up the opportunity to point out them using the terms “successful mothering” and “one of whom is now pregnant herself” in the same sentence. Uh…WHAT? But excuse me…I guess as long as more babies are being produced, everything is just peachy, it doesn’t matter the circumstances.
What exactly is so “patriotic” about a large family? For starters, bigger is practically always better when it comes to great powers.
Ahh…yes, the ol’ Breed For Your Country ploy. Now, not only is the Right accusing anyone who is slightly Left of being un-patriotic, now they’re trying to imply that if you’re not breeding, you’re not doing your part to help your country. Au contraire!
So, while any portrayal of Sarah Palin as some sort of iconic representation of fertility or fecundity might seem far-fetched, it is entirely possible that the images of her with her five children will have a positive and perhaps fateful impact on voters this November.
If so, it would be the mother of all political success stories.
OMG…there just are no words, NO WORDS. I’m so disgusted by this piece of “journalism” that I, for once have just run out of things to say in addition to being just so miffed (putting it mildly).
And another little tidbit for the masses:
Firmly committed environmentalists and deeply entrenched feminists, to name two important groups, are not likely to respond positively to Palin’s ability to produce a Baby-Boom-sized brood, but they are not the types who would ever vote Republican anyway.
Damn straight. Nice to see you got something right. Give ‘em a cookie…
Have at it! I know there’s bound to be some hot opinions on this one and I’m really looking forward to the discussion.
Recent Comments